<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 02:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>DOL Proposes New FLSA Independent Contractor Analysis</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/dol-proposes-new-flsa-independent-contractor-analysis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 02:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FMLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fsla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7680</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On February 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a proposed rule that would make it easier for employers to classify certain workers as independent contractors rather than employees for purposes of federal wage and hour laws (FLSA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In a change from the current approach, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/dol-proposes-new-flsa-independent-contractor-analysis/">DOL Proposes New FLSA Independent Contractor Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7680" class="elementor elementor-7680" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-ab26bf9 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="ab26bf9" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-f44369b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="f44369b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On February 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued a <a href="https://public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-03962.pdf">proposed rule</a> that would make it easier for employers to classify certain workers as independent contractors rather than employees for purposes of federal wage and hour laws (FLSA) and the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). In a change from the current approach, the proposed rule emphasizes an “economic realities” test focusing on whether the worker is operating their own business or is dependent on the employer for work. The DOL frames the change as a chance to streamline the analysis, focusing first on two “core factors” to help determine if a worker is economically dependent on an employer for work or is in business for themself: (a) the nature and degree of control over the work; and (b) the worker’s opportunity for profit or loss based on initiative and/or investment.</p><p>If the core factors are not definitive, the analysis would then consider “other factors,” including the amount of skill required for the work, degree of permanence of the working relationship, and whether the work is part of an integrated unit of production in the employer’s business. The proposed rule emphasizes that the parties’ actual practice is more relevant than what may be contractually or theoretically possible. The proposed rule also includes eight fact-specific examples to help parties understand how the analysis could work.</p><p>The distinction between an independent contractor and an employee is key for purposes of applying a number of federal laws. The FLSA generally requires employers to pay employees a minimum hourly wage for their compensable work hours, and to pay nonexempt employees one-and-one-half times their regular hourly rate for hours worked over 40 in a week. Independent contractors are not covered by the FLSA. The federal FMLA requires covered employers to provide eligible employees with up to 12 weeks of protected, unpaid leave from work for qualifying reasons, and prohibits employers from interfering with employees’ exercise of their rights under the law. Employers have no duty to provide independent contractors with any FMLA leave.</p><p>The DOL is soliciting comments on the proposed rule from interested parties within 60 days of publication. Comments are due by 11:58 p.m. EDT on April 28, 2026. After this, the DOL will review the comments, and then publish a final rule which takes effect and is enforceable 30 days thereafter; <strong>until then, the 2024 standard remains in effect. We will continue to keep you apprised of its status.</strong></p><p>Employers should keep in mind that state laws also apply on this issue and should ensure compliance with state law, as well.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related agency and legislative actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/dol-proposes-new-flsa-independent-contractor-analysis/">DOL Proposes New FLSA Independent Contractor Analysis</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emily Gnam Joins the team!</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/emily-gnam-joins-the-team/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 14:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lake Effect HR &#38; Law, LLC, is pleased to announce that Emily R. Gnam has joined our team, furthering our mission to maximize each client’s workplace potential with a commitment to kindness, true partnership and exceptional service. Emily has over 27 years of experience in the private sector and brings a wealth of expertise in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/emily-gnam-joins-the-team/">Emily Gnam Joins the team!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7649" class="elementor elementor-7649" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-031a477 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="031a477" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-8d4a320 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="8d4a320" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="size-medium wp-image-7625 alignleft" src="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/emily-gnam-web-240x300.jpg" alt="emily gnam headshot" width="240" height="300" srcset="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/emily-gnam-web-240x300.jpg 240w, https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/emily-gnam-web.jpg 400w" sizes="(max-width: 240px) 100vw, 240px" />Lake Effect HR &amp; Law, LLC, is pleased to announce that <strong>Emily R. Gnam </strong>has joined our team, furthering our mission to maximize each client’s workplace potential with a commitment to kindness, true partnership and exceptional service.</p><p>Emily has over 27 years of experience in the private sector and brings a wealth of expertise in management-side employment law, traditional labor law, and human resources strategies. As a collaborative team builder, thoughtful advisor, and creative problem solver, Emily reflects Lake Effect’s core mission, vision, and values.</p><p>Prior to joining Lake Effect, Emily was with TruStage (formerly CUNA Mutual Group), where she worked closely with the human resources team and provided practical legal and HR advice to leaders across the company. In her role, Emily also conducted and managed workplace investigations and complex employee relations, benefits, and leave matters.  Emily is committed to helping employers explore practical solutions that mitigate legal risk while advancing an organization’s strategic goals and unique culture.</p><p>Before joining TruStage, Emily practiced at Foley and Lardner, where she advised clients on labor and employment law and handled general corporate litigation. Emily has represented employers before federal, state and local administrative agencies, arbitrators, and in state and federal trial and appellate courts.</p><p>“I am very excited to be joining the incredible team at Lake Effect,” <strong>Gnam </strong>said. “The firm has distinguished itself as thought leaders in all facets of HR and employment law and are committed community partners. I look forward to applying my background to help Lake Effect’s clients in the care of their employees.”</p><p><strong>Jane Clark</strong>, Lake Effect CEO and Managing Partner, remarked on how fortunate the firm was to recruit Emily, “I have known Emily for years, both personally and professionally, and have always been impressed with her intellect, problem-solving skills, and compassion—all essential to serving our clients well.”</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/emily-gnam-joins-the-team/">Emily Gnam Joins the team!</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC Rescinds Harassment Guidance</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-rescinds-harassment-guidance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respectful workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted 2-1 to rescind its “Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace” (Harassment Guidance), a 190-page document which had been approved in 2024. Although the Harassment Guidance did not have the force of law, it aimed to help employers identify and prevent activities that could [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-rescinds-harassment-guidance/">EEOC Rescinds Harassment Guidance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7585" class="elementor elementor-7585" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-f47e186 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="f47e186" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-dc2ec94 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="dc2ec94" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-commission-votes-rescind-2024-harassment-guidance" target="_blank" rel="noopener">voted</a> 2-1 to rescind its “Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace” (Harassment Guidance), a 190-page document which had been approved in 2024.</p>
<p>Although the Harassment Guidance did not have the force of law, it aimed to help employers identify and prevent activities that could constitute unlawful harassment based upon race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, and genetic information. It specifically included guidance relating to gender identity discrimination and harassment of LGBTQ+ individuals.</p>
<p>The withdrawal of the Harassment Guidance is consistent with the Trump Administration’s prior <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order</a> directing executive agencies to enforce federal laws based upon a recognition of two sexes, male and female, specifically excluding any concept of gender identify. It signals the EEOC’s intent to investigate and litigate a much narrower scope of sex discrimination claims.</p>
<p>The rescission of the Harassment Guidance does not alter Title VII or any other federal anti-discrimination statute. Employers should continue to comply with those statutes as written and as previously interpreted by courts. Employers are also bound by applicable state laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, and they should take careful note of how those terms are defined under each state’s law. This also does not alter an employer’s responsibility to educate their employees on their organization’s respectful workplace policy through periodic training.</p>
<p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on agency guidelines, employment laws, and regulations. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-rescinds-harassment-guidance/">EEOC Rescinds Harassment Guidance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits Limits for 2026</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2026/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2025 02:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefit plans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Each year, the IRS sets new limits for ACA high deductible plans, employee benefits plans, flex plans, QSEHRAs, and retirement plans. Below is Lake Effect’s ready reference chart showing the Benefits Limits for the 2026 tax year. Download Benefits Table   2025 2026 Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs)     Healthcare FSA max election (per year) [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2026/">Benefits Limits for 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7526" class="elementor elementor-7526" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-33b8dbd e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="33b8dbd" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-ed11981 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="ed11981" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>Each year, the IRS sets new limits for <a href="https://www.healthcare.gov/glossary/out-of-pocket-maximum-limit/#:~:text=For%20the%202025%20plan%20year,and%20%2418%2C400%20for%20a%20family.">ACA high deductible plans</a>, <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-19.pdf">employee benefits plans,</a> <a href="https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/irs-releases-tax-inflation-adjustments-for-tax-year-2026-including-amendments-from-the-one-big-beautiful-bill">flex plans</a>, <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-25-32.pdf">QSEHRAs</a>, and <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-25-67.pdf">retirement plans</a>. Below is Lake Effect’s ready reference chart showing the Benefits Limits for the 2026 tax year.</p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5c9709c elementor-align-right elementor-widget elementor-widget-button" data-id="5c9709c" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="button.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="elementor-button-wrapper">
					<a class="elementor-button elementor-button-link elementor-size-xs" href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2026-2/" target="_blank">
						<span class="elementor-button-content-wrapper">
									<span class="elementor-button-text">Download Benefits Table</span>
					</span>
					</a>
				</div>
								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
		<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7540ad4 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="7540ad4" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-ba1f408 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="ba1f408" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<table width="800"><tbody><tr><td width="448"> </td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67"><strong>2025</strong></td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77"><strong>2026</strong></td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs)</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448">Healthcare FSA max election (per year) (incl. LTD FSA)</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$3,300</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$3,400</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Healthcare FSA max rollover</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$660</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$680</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Dependent Care FSA max election (per year) (Single or Married Filing Jointly)</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$5,000</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$7,500</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Dependent Care FSA max election (per year) (Married Filing Separately)</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$2,500</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$3,750</td></tr><tr><td width="448"> </td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Transportation Benefits</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td style="text-align: left;" width="448">Parking Account</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$325/mo</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$340/mo</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Transit Account</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$325/mo</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$340/mo</td></tr><tr><td width="448"> </td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>High Deductible Health Plan Requirements to Contribute to an HSA</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448">HDHP min annual deductible &#8211; Self-only</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$1,650</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$1,700</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HDHP min annual deductible &#8211; Family</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$3,300</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$3,400</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HDHP out-of-pocket max &#8211; Self-only</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$8,300</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$8,500</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HDHP out-of-pocket max &#8211; Family</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$16,600</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$17,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HSA max contribution limit &#8211; Self-only</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$4,300</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$4,400</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HSA max contribution limit &#8211; Family</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$8,550</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$8,750</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HSA catch up contribution limit (age 55+)</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$1,000</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$1,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448">HRA max employer contribution limit</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$2,150</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$2,200</td></tr><tr><td width="448"> </td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>ACA Plan Limits</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448">Maximum Out-of-Pocket (Self-only or Individual in a Family)</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$9,200</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$10,600</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Maximum Out-of-Pocket (Family)</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$18,400</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$21,200</td></tr><tr><td width="448"> </td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>QSEHRA (Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement) – Max Employer contribution</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448">To Individual</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$6,350</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$6,450</td></tr><tr><td width="448">To Family</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$12,800</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$13,100</td></tr><tr><td width="448"><strong> </strong></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Salary Thresholds for Non-discrimination Testing</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448">Highly compensated employees</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$160,000</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$160,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Key employees</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$230,000</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$235,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448"> </td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448"><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Retirement Plans (401(k), 403(b))</strong></span></td><td width="67"> </td><td width="77"> </td></tr><tr><td width="448">Max employee elective contributions for those 49 and younger</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$23,500</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$24,500</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Max employer + employee contributions for those 49 and younger</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$70,000</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$72,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Max employee catch-up contributions for those 50+</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$7,500</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$8,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Max employee elective contribution plus catch-up for those 50+</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$30,500</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$32,500</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Max employer + employee contributions for those 50+</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$76,500</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$80,000</td></tr><tr><td width="448">Max employee catch-up contributions for those 60-63</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="67">$11,250</td><td style="text-align: right;" width="77">$11,250</td></tr></tbody></table>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2026/">Benefits Limits for 2026</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Updated W-2 Tax Form: Tax Deductions on Qualified Tips and a Portion of Overtime Pay</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/updated-w-2-tax-form-tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 14:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form w-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualified tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tipping]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE TO LAKE EFFECT’S AUGUST 27, 2025 BLOG ON THIS TOPIC In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s signature budget bill became law as Public Law 119-21.  Of note for employers and employees, the bill permits tax deductions for “qualified tips” and a portion of overtime pay, as detailed in this IRS Fact Sheet.  In August, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/updated-w-2-tax-form-tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/">Updated W-2 Tax Form: Tax Deductions on Qualified Tips and a Portion of Overtime Pay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7514" class="elementor elementor-7514" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-6924884 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="6924884" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-e826f86 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="e826f86" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><em>UPDATE TO LAKE EFFECT’S </em></strong></span><a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><em>AUGUST 27, 2025 BLOG</em></strong></span></a><strong><em><span style="color: #ff0000;"> ON THIS TOPIC</span></em></strong></p><p>In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s signature budget bill became law as <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Public Law 119-21</a>.  Of note for employers and employees, the bill permits tax deductions for “qualified tips” and a portion of overtime pay, as detailed in this <a href="https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-tax-deductions-for-working-americans-and-seniors" target="_blank" rel="noopener">IRS Fact</a> Sheet. </p><p>In August, IRS released a <u>draft</u> updated W-2 (see <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">prior blog</a>) and pledged to provide guidance on the “reasonable method” that employers should use to “approximate” the amount of “qualified tips,” that employee can deduct. <br />To date, the IRS has not released that guidance and has not issued a <u>final</u> updated W-2 for 2025.</p><p><strong>Last week, </strong><a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/"><strong>the IRS announced</strong></a><strong> that employers will not face penalties for failing to comply with the Act’s reporting requirements and that it would not publish a final updated W-2 for tax year 2025.</strong></p><p>Employers are advised to consult with their payroll administrators to ensure that employee tips and overtime are adequately tracked and reported.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/updated-w-2-tax-form-tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/">Updated W-2 Tax Form: Tax Deductions on Qualified Tips and a Portion of Overtime Pay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Deductions on Qualified Tips and a Portion of Overtime Pay</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 12:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form w-2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qualified tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tipping]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s signature budget bill became law as Public Law 119-21. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/">Tax Deductions on Qualified Tips and a Portion of Overtime Pay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7344" class="elementor elementor-7344" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div data-gbadge="{&quot;text&quot;:&quot;Updated&quot;,&quot;icon&quot;:false}" class="elementor-element elementor-element-0b042ff premium-gbadge-yes premium-gbadge-flag e-flex e-con-boxed premium-gbadge-right e-con e-parent" data-id="0b042ff" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-c404473 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="c404473" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><span style="color: #0099cc;"><strong><em>8/27/2025 UPDATE</em></strong><strong><em>:</em></strong></span></p><p>The IRS has released a new <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/fw2--dft.pdf">“early release draft” Form W-2</a> to reflect the new employee and employer reporting requirements related to “qualified tips” and “qualified overtime pay” that can be deducted, pursuant to the 2025 Trump Administration bill.  The new Form W-2 instructions direct employers to use Box 12 to report the employee’s “qualified tips” using code “TP” and “qualified overtime compensation” using code “TT.” Further, the new form also includes a new Box 14b for employers to report the employee’s qualifying occupation (referred to as the “Treasury tipped occupation code”). See below for a snapshot of the new Form W-2. <strong> Employers should communicate with their payroll provider to ensure their systems will be updated to reflect the new reporting requirements and the ability to report on the new Form W-2 in time for Form W-2 distribution in January 2026.</strong> Please see below <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/"><span style="color: 0099cc;">and this link to our August 12, 2025 blog</span></a> which explains this issue more fully.</p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-b451428 elementor-widget elementor-widget-image" data-id="b451428" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="image.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
															<img decoding="async" width="800" height="561" src="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/fw2-dft-2-1024x718.webp" class="attachment-large size-large wp-image-7425" alt="Picture of Form W-2" srcset="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/fw2-dft-2-1024x718.webp 1024w, https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/fw2-dft-2-300x210.webp 300w, https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/fw2-dft-2-768x539.webp 768w, https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/fw2-dft-2-1536x1077.webp 1536w, https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/fw2-dft-2-2048x1436.webp 2048w" sizes="(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px" />															</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
		<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-e18e8c1 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="e18e8c1" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-51e489c elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="51e489c" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p><strong>Originally published 8/12/2025:</strong></p><p>In July 2025, the Trump Administration’s signature budget bill became law as <a href="https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/1">Public Law 119-21</a>.  Of note for employers and employees, the bill permits tax deductions for “qualified tips” and a portion of overtime pay, as detailed in this <a href="https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/one-big-beautiful-bill-act-tax-deductions-for-working-americans-and-seniors">IRS Fact</a> Sheet. </p><p><strong>Tax Deduction on Qualified Tips: </strong>Retroactive to January 1, 2025, and through 2028, <strong>employees and self-employed workers may deduct “qualified tips” that are received in the course of jobs that “customarily and regularly receive tips on or before December 31, 2024 and that are reported on Form W-2 by their employer, </strong>Form 1099 by the contracting company, or other tax reporting statement provided by the individual. To encourage employers to report all received tips, there is a requirement that employers must report the “qualified tips” on a Form W-2 or similar reporting form for employees to be able to deduct the tips.  <strong>“Qualified tips” are those cash or charged tips received voluntarily from customers or through tip sharing; they do not include mandatory or preset tips for larger tables or service charges.</strong> The maximum annual deduction is $25,000 for employees and, for self-employed workers, may not exceed their net income from the work in which the tips were earned. The deduction phases out for taxpayers with a modified gross income over $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers).</p><p><strong>Tax Deduction on a Portion of Overtime Pay</strong>: Retroactive to January 1, 2025, and through 2028, <strong>individuals who receive “qualified overtime pay” may deduct the portion that exceeds their regular rate of pay as required by the Fair Labor Standards Act and that are reported on Form W-2 by their employer, </strong>Form 1099 by the contracting company, or other tax reporting statement provided by the individual. <strong>Thus, when an employee receives time-and-a-half for overtime, only the “half” portion may be deducted. Further, overtime pay not required under the FLSA, such as overtime required only by state law, an employee handbook policy, or a collective bargaining agreement may <u>not</u> be deducted.</strong> The maximum annual deduction is $12,500 ($25,000 for joint filers). The deduction phases out for taxpayers with a modified gross income over $150,000 ($300,000 for joint filers).</p><p>Employers are advised to consult with their payroll administrators to ensure that employee tips and overtime are adequately tracked and reported.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tax-deductions-on-qualified-tips-and-a-portion-of-overtime-pay/">Tax Deductions on Qualified Tips and a Portion of Overtime Pay</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Clarifies Standard in “Reverse Discrimination” Lawsuits</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/scotus-clarifies-standard-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scotus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On June 5, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the legal burden of proof required to establish a “reverse discrimination” claim. In “reverse discrimination” cases, a member of a majority group alleges they were discriminated against based on their membership in that majority group.   The question before the Court was whether majority-group plaintiffs claiming [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/scotus-clarifies-standard-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits/">SCOTUS Clarifies Standard in “Reverse Discrimination” Lawsuits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7327" class="elementor elementor-7327" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-d110e62 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="d110e62" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-b7f59e3 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="b7f59e3" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On June 5, 2025, the <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1039_c0n2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">U.S. Supreme Court</a> unanimously affirmed the legal burden of proof required to establish a “reverse discrimination” claim. In “reverse discrimination” cases, a member of a majority group alleges they were discriminated against based on their membership in that majority group.   The question before the Court was whether majority-group plaintiffs claiming discrimination had to meet a higher burden of proof than minority-group plaintiffs. Specifically, whether they had to demonstrate “background circumstances” to support that the defendant was an “unusual” employer that discriminated against the majority, as some lower courts had ruled.  The Supreme Court unanimously responded, “No” and confirmed that the burden of proof is the same for every plaintiff who alleges discrimination, regardless of their majority or minority group status.  <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1039_c0n2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Ames v. Ohio Dep’t of Youth Servs.</em>, No. 23-1039 (U.S. June 5, 2025)</a>.</p><p>In <a href="https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1039_c0n2.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><em>Ames</em></a>, a heterosexual woman claimed she was discriminated against when she was passed up for promotion in favor of a lesbian woman and later demoted in favor of a gay man. Her case was initially dismissed because she did not offer evidence of “background circumstances” showing the defendant was a rare employer that discriminated against majority employees.  The U.S. Supreme Court, however, reversed the lower court’s ruling, reasoning that the text of Title VII, which bars discrimination “against any individual…because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin,” focuses on <em>individuals</em> rather than groups. Therefore, courts should not apply special evidentiary burdens to majority-group plaintiffs.  The Court clarified that “this additional ‘background circumstances’ requirement is not consistent with Title VII’s text or our case law construing the statute.” This decision reinforces the notion that Title VII protects all employees from discrimination, regardless of whether the individual is part of a minority or majority group.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at info@le-hrlaw.com or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/scotus-clarifies-standard-in-reverse-discrimination-lawsuits/">SCOTUS Clarifies Standard in “Reverse Discrimination” Lawsuits</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump Executive Order Vows to Eliminate Disparate Impact Liability</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/trump-executive-order-vows-to-eliminate-disparate-impact-liability/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 14:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Trump Administration has directed a sweeping change to employment discrimination liability under Title VII in its recent executive order titled, “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy.”</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/trump-executive-order-vows-to-eliminate-disparate-impact-liability/">Trump Executive Order Vows to Eliminate Disparate Impact Liability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7312" class="elementor elementor-7312" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-9b1fe76 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="9b1fe76" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-eeaea1e elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="eeaea1e" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>The Trump Administration has directed a sweeping change to employment discrimination liability under Title VII in its recent <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/restoring-equality-of-opportunity-and-meritocracy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">executive order</a> titled, “Restoring Equality of Opportunity and Meritocracy.” The EO announces a new policy to “eliminate the use of disparate-impact liability in all contexts to the maximum degree possible to avoid violating the Constitution, Federal civil rights laws, and basic American ideals.”</p><p>Under current law, established by the Supreme Court in 1971 and codified by Congress through a 1991 amendment to Title VII, plaintiffs can pursue employment discrimination claims under one of two theories: (1) disparate treatment, by claiming that an employer intentionally treats an individual differently based on membership in a protected class; or (2) disparate impact, by claiming that an employer has a facially neutral policy or practice that nevertheless has a disproportionately negative impact on individuals in a protected class. In the latter case, a plaintiff need not present evidence that the employer intended to adversely affect the plaintiff or the protected group. Disparate impact theory has historically been used to challenge such policies as minimum height requirements, education or degree requirements not closely tied to job-related skills, and aptitude/personality tests.</p><p>The Trump <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/restoring-equality-of-opportunity-and-meritocracy/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">executive order</a> announces that disparate impact liability “is wholly inconsistent with the Constitution and threatens the commitment to merit and equality of opportunity that forms the foundation of the American Dream.” The EO therefore directs that:</p><ul><li>Federal departments and agencies deprioritize enforcement of all statutes and regulations to the extent that they include disparate impact liability.</li><li>The Attorney General (AG) and EEOC assess pending investigations and suits that rely on disparate impact theory and take action consistent with the EO.</li><li>Federal agencies review any consent judgments or permanent injunctions that rely on the disparate impact theory and take appropriate action;</li><li>The AG assess whether the new federal policy preempts state laws or regulations that impose disparate impact liability;</li><li>The AG and EEOC jointly issue new guidance or technical assistance to employers on appropriate methods to promote equal access to employment.</li></ul><p>The practical implications of the <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/restoring-equality-of-opportunity-and-meritocracy/">executive order</a> remain to be seen. The EO is not law, and it cannot override Supreme Court precedent or existing statutory regulations. While private plaintiffs may continue to pursue disparate impact discrimination claims, employers can assume that the EEOC will not investigate or pursue disparate impact claims moving forward. We may also see challenges to state and local laws that permit disparate impact claims on the basis that those laws are preempted by new federal policy. For now, employers should act consistent with current applicable federal and state laws, carefully reviewing neutral employment policies and practices to ensure that they do not have a disproportionately negative impact on members of any protected group.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at info@le-hrlaw.com or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/trump-executive-order-vows-to-eliminate-disparate-impact-liability/">Trump Executive Order Vows to Eliminate Disparate Impact Liability</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>USCIS Releases Revised Form I-9</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/uscis-releases-revised-form-i-9/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Form I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[I-9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USCIS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>USCIS issued a revised Form I-9 on April 2, 2025 with an edition date of 01/20/25 and an expiration date of 05/31/2027. Although revisions are minor, it is important to use the approved and unexpired versions of the Form I-9. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/uscis-releases-revised-form-i-9/">USCIS Releases Revised Form I-9</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7289" class="elementor elementor-7289" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-a1a37b6 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="a1a37b6" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-e7c21bf elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="e7c21bf" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>USCIS issued a <a href="https://www.uscis.gov/i-9-central/form-i-9-related-news/minor-changes-to-form-i-9-and-e-verify-updates">revised Form I-9</a> on April 2, 2025 with an <a href="https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/i-9.pdf">edition date of 01/20/25</a> and an expiration date of 05/31/2027. Minor revisions were made to align with statutory language and update the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Privacy Notice. Key updates include:</p><ul><li>Renaming the fourth checkbox in Section 1 “A noncitizen authorized to work” to “An alien authorized to work”</li><li>Revising the descriptions of two List B documents in the Lists of Acceptable Documents (changing “gender” to “sex” in the description of List B documents)</li><li>Adding appropriate statutory language and a revised DHS Privacy Notice to the instruction</li></ul><p>E-Verify and E-Verify+ has updated the Citizen Status selection during case creation as of April 3, 2025, to reflect these changes. Employers should note, if an employee attests on earlier editions of the Form I-9 as “a noncitizen authorized to work,” the employer must select “an alien authorized to work” in E-Verify.</p><p>Although revisions are minor, it is important to use the approved and unexpired versions of the Form I-9. Lake Effect HR &amp; Law recommends using <a href="https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/forms/i-9.pdf">the latest 01/20/25 edition of the Form I-9</a> found on the USCIS website. However, employers may continue to use the following two previous editions until the expiration date listed on the top-right corner of the form:</p><ul><li>Form I-9 (08/01/23 edition) that is valid until 05/31/2027</li><li>Form I-9 (08/02/23 edition) that is valid until 07/31/2026</li></ul><p>If you would like assistance or guidance in completing new Form I-9s, complying with the Form I-9 identification or retention requirements, or conducting internal I-9 audits, please contact Lake Effect at info@le-hrlaw.com or 1-844-333-5253.</p><p>Lake Effect is here to answer all your questions about employment laws, regulations, and new agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at info@le-hrlaw.com or 1-844-333-5253. </p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/uscis-releases-revised-form-i-9/">USCIS Releases Revised Form I-9</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC and DOJ Warn Against Unlawful DEI-Related Discrimination</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-and-doj-warn-against-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 06:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respectful workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace discrimination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 16, the EEOC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) warned against DEI-related discrimination in the workplace in a technical assistance document.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-and-doj-warn-against-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination/">EEOC and DOJ Warn Against Unlawful DEI-Related Discrimination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7282" class="elementor elementor-7282" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7b0eec1 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="7b0eec1" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-3f1e0f2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="3f1e0f2" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On March 16, the EEOC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) warned against DEI-related discrimination in the workplace in a technical assistance document entitled <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/what-do-if-you-experience-discrimination-related-dei-work?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work.&#8221;</a> The EEOC simultaneously published <a href="https://links-1.govdelivery.com/CL0/https:%2F%2Fwww.eeoc.gov%2Fwysk%2Fwhat-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work%3Futm_content=%26utm_medium=email%26utm_name=%26utm_source=govdelivery%26utm_term=/1/01000195b000714a-531431a7-3263-4839-859f-989954da41e3-000000/iHq1QDqd67v-GWQeGDtnyGzgGUBLRgJV02hvgagtkO0=397" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work,&#8221;</a> a longer FAQ style guide. The documents (“guidance”) are consistent with the directives in President Trump’s January 20, 2025, <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/29/2025-01953/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order 14151</a> and <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02097/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order 14173</a>, summarized in a <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/presidential-executive-orders-reject-gender-ideology-and-illegal-dei-programs/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">previous Lake Effect blog</a>.</p><p>The guidance summarizes the process for filing a discrimination charge with the EEOC. It states that Title VII applies to employees, potential and actual applicants, interns, and training program participants, and that “Title VII’s protections apply equally to all racial, ethnic, and national origin groups, as well as both sexes.”</p><p>In addition, the guidance identifies DEI-related initiatives, policies, programs, or practices that may constitute unlawful discrimination to the extent that any action is motivated (in whole or in part) by an individual’s race, sex, or other protected characteristic. Examples of prohibited actions include:</p><ul><li>Disparate treatment in the terms and conditions of employment, which may include access to or exclusion from training (including leadership development programs), mentoring, sponsorship, networking, internship, or fellowship programs, as well as selection for interviews (including placement in or exclusion from a candidate slate or pool).</li><li>Limiting, segregating, and classifying employees, which may include “limiting membership in workplace groups such as Employee Resource Groups (ERG) or other employee affinity groups, to certain protected groups,” and “separating employees into groups based on race, sex, or another protected characteristic when administering DEI or other trainings, or other privileges of employment, even if the separate groups receive the same programming content or amount of employer resources.”</li><li>Harassment, which may occur when someone is subjected to unwelcome remarks or conduct based on race, sex, or other protected characteristics. “Depending on the facts, DEI training may give rise to a colorable hostile work environment claim.”</li><li>Retaliation against an individual who has engaged in a protected activity, which may include reasonable opposition to DEI training “if the employee provides a fact-specific basis for his or her belief that the training violates Title VII.”</li></ul><p>The <a href="https://links-1.govdelivery.com/CL0/https:%2F%2Fwww.eeoc.gov%2Fwysk%2Fwhat-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work%3Futm_content=%26utm_medium=email%26utm_name=%26utm_source=govdelivery%26utm_term=/1/01000195b000714a-531431a7-3263-4839-859f-989954da41e3-000000/iHq1QDqd67v-GWQeGDtnyGzgGUBLRgJV02hvgagtkO0=397" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EEOC&#8217;s FAQ document</a> specifies that an employer <em>cannot</em> justify taking an employment action based on race, sex, or another protected characteristic because the employer has a general business necessity or interest in “diversity,” including preferences or requests by the employer’s clients or customers.</p><p>Although the guidance does not have the force of law or alter Title VII in any way, it does suggest that the current EEOC will closely scrutinize DEI-related activities in the workplace. Given this dramatic shift from the approach of the prior administration, Employers should carefully review any DEI-related activities to minimize exposure to unlawful discrimination claims. Your partners at Lake Effect can help you assess your policies and practices for compliance.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related Executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at info@le-hrlaw.com or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-and-doj-warn-against-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination/">EEOC and DOJ Warn Against Unlawful DEI-Related Discrimination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
