<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>employment law Archives - Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tag/employment-law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/tag/employment-law/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 16:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>EEOC Rescinds Harassment Guidance</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-rescinds-harassment-guidance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 14:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respectful workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7585</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) voted 2-1 to rescind its “Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace” (Harassment Guidance), a 190-page document which had been approved in 2024. Although the Harassment Guidance did not have the force of law, it aimed to help employers identify and prevent activities that could [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-rescinds-harassment-guidance/">EEOC Rescinds Harassment Guidance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7585" class="elementor elementor-7585" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-f47e186 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="f47e186" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-dc2ec94 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="dc2ec94" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On January 22, 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/newsroom/eeoc-commission-votes-rescind-2024-harassment-guidance" target="_blank" rel="noopener">voted</a> 2-1 to rescind its “Enforcement Guidance on Harassment in the Workplace” (Harassment Guidance), a 190-page document which had been approved in 2024.</p>
<p>Although the Harassment Guidance did not have the force of law, it aimed to help employers identify and prevent activities that could constitute unlawful harassment based upon race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, and genetic information. It specifically included guidance relating to gender identity discrimination and harassment of LGBTQ+ individuals.</p>
<p>The withdrawal of the Harassment Guidance is consistent with the Trump Administration’s prior <a href="https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal-government/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order</a> directing executive agencies to enforce federal laws based upon a recognition of two sexes, male and female, specifically excluding any concept of gender identify. It signals the EEOC’s intent to investigate and litigate a much narrower scope of sex discrimination claims.</p>
<p>The rescission of the Harassment Guidance does not alter Title VII or any other federal anti-discrimination statute. Employers should continue to comply with those statutes as written and as previously interpreted by courts. Employers are also bound by applicable state laws prohibiting discrimination and harassment, and they should take careful note of how those terms are defined under each state’s law. This also does not alter an employer’s responsibility to educate their employees on their organization’s respectful workplace policy through periodic training.</p>
<p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on agency guidelines, employment laws, and regulations. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-rescinds-harassment-guidance/">EEOC Rescinds Harassment Guidance</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>EEOC and DOJ Warn Against Unlawful DEI-Related Discrimination</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-and-doj-warn-against-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 06:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[respectful workplace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace discrimination]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 16, the EEOC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) warned against DEI-related discrimination in the workplace in a technical assistance document.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-and-doj-warn-against-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination/">EEOC and DOJ Warn Against Unlawful DEI-Related Discrimination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7282" class="elementor elementor-7282" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-7b0eec1 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="7b0eec1" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-3f1e0f2 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="3f1e0f2" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On March 16, the EEOC and the Department of Justice (DOJ) warned against DEI-related discrimination in the workplace in a technical assistance document entitled <a href="https://www.eeoc.gov/what-do-if-you-experience-discrimination-related-dei-work?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;What To Do If You Experience Discrimination Related to DEI at Work.&#8221;</a> The EEOC simultaneously published <a href="https://links-1.govdelivery.com/CL0/https:%2F%2Fwww.eeoc.gov%2Fwysk%2Fwhat-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work%3Futm_content=%26utm_medium=email%26utm_name=%26utm_source=govdelivery%26utm_term=/1/01000195b000714a-531431a7-3263-4839-859f-989954da41e3-000000/iHq1QDqd67v-GWQeGDtnyGzgGUBLRgJV02hvgagtkO0=397" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;What You Should Know About DEI-Related Discrimination at Work,&#8221;</a> a longer FAQ style guide. The documents (“guidance”) are consistent with the directives in President Trump’s January 20, 2025, <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/29/2025-01953/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order 14151</a> and <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02097/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Executive Order 14173</a>, summarized in a <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/presidential-executive-orders-reject-gender-ideology-and-illegal-dei-programs/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">previous Lake Effect blog</a>.</p><p>The guidance summarizes the process for filing a discrimination charge with the EEOC. It states that Title VII applies to employees, potential and actual applicants, interns, and training program participants, and that “Title VII’s protections apply equally to all racial, ethnic, and national origin groups, as well as both sexes.”</p><p>In addition, the guidance identifies DEI-related initiatives, policies, programs, or practices that may constitute unlawful discrimination to the extent that any action is motivated (in whole or in part) by an individual’s race, sex, or other protected characteristic. Examples of prohibited actions include:</p><ul><li>Disparate treatment in the terms and conditions of employment, which may include access to or exclusion from training (including leadership development programs), mentoring, sponsorship, networking, internship, or fellowship programs, as well as selection for interviews (including placement in or exclusion from a candidate slate or pool).</li><li>Limiting, segregating, and classifying employees, which may include “limiting membership in workplace groups such as Employee Resource Groups (ERG) or other employee affinity groups, to certain protected groups,” and “separating employees into groups based on race, sex, or another protected characteristic when administering DEI or other trainings, or other privileges of employment, even if the separate groups receive the same programming content or amount of employer resources.”</li><li>Harassment, which may occur when someone is subjected to unwelcome remarks or conduct based on race, sex, or other protected characteristics. “Depending on the facts, DEI training may give rise to a colorable hostile work environment claim.”</li><li>Retaliation against an individual who has engaged in a protected activity, which may include reasonable opposition to DEI training “if the employee provides a fact-specific basis for his or her belief that the training violates Title VII.”</li></ul><p>The <a href="https://links-1.govdelivery.com/CL0/https:%2F%2Fwww.eeoc.gov%2Fwysk%2Fwhat-you-should-know-about-dei-related-discrimination-work%3Futm_content=%26utm_medium=email%26utm_name=%26utm_source=govdelivery%26utm_term=/1/01000195b000714a-531431a7-3263-4839-859f-989954da41e3-000000/iHq1QDqd67v-GWQeGDtnyGzgGUBLRgJV02hvgagtkO0=397" target="_blank" rel="noopener">EEOC&#8217;s FAQ document</a> specifies that an employer <em>cannot</em> justify taking an employment action based on race, sex, or another protected characteristic because the employer has a general business necessity or interest in “diversity,” including preferences or requests by the employer’s clients or customers.</p><p>Although the guidance does not have the force of law or alter Title VII in any way, it does suggest that the current EEOC will closely scrutinize DEI-related activities in the workplace. Given this dramatic shift from the approach of the prior administration, Employers should carefully review any DEI-related activities to minimize exposure to unlawful discrimination claims. Your partners at Lake Effect can help you assess your policies and practices for compliance.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related Executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at info@le-hrlaw.com or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/eeoc-and-doj-warn-against-unlawful-dei-related-discrimination/">EEOC and DOJ Warn Against Unlawful DEI-Related Discrimination</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presidential Executive Orders Reject Gender Ideology and Illegal DEI Programs</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/presidential-executive-orders-reject-gender-ideology-and-illegal-dei-programs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[executive order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Employer responses to Executive Orders should be tailored based on corporate and regulatory status, funding sources, and industry. Lake Effect is here to answer your questions and discuss potential implications of these recent Orders. </p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/presidential-executive-orders-reject-gender-ideology-and-illegal-dei-programs/">Presidential Executive Orders Reject Gender Ideology and Illegal DEI Programs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7262" class="elementor elementor-7262" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-bdf72f6 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="bdf72f6" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-f14b912 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="f14b912" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued <strong><a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/30/2025-02090/defending-women-from-gender-ideology-extremism-and-restoring-biological-truth-to-the-federal?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=">Executive Order 4168: Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government</a>.</strong> The Order announces the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. It specifies that “‘[s]ex’’ is not a synonym for and does not include the concept of ‘gender identity.’” The Order further states that federal funds shall not be used to promote gender ideology, and “[e]ach agency shall assess grant conditions and grantee preferences and ensure grant funds do not promote gender ideology.”</p><p>On January 20, 2025, President Trump also issued<strong> <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/29/2025-01953/ending-radical-and-wasteful-government-dei-programs-and-preferencing?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=">Executive Order 14151: Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing</a>,</strong> which calls for the termination of illegal Diversity, Equity, Inclusion (“DEI”) mandates, policies, programs, preferences and activities in the federal government, under whatever name they appear. Among other things, the Order directs federal agency, commission, and department heads to identify federal contractors who have provided DEI training to federal employees and grantees who received federal funding to advance DEI programs, services, or activities since January 20, 2021. On January 21, 2025, President Trump issued <strong> <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2025/01/31/2025-02097/ending-illegal-discrimination-and-restoring-merit-based-opportunity?utm_content=&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_name=&amp;utm_source=govdelivery&amp;utm_term=">Executive Order 14173: Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity</a>,</strong> which orders all federal agencies to enforce federal civil rights laws and combat illegal private sector DEI preferences, mandates, policies, programs, and activities. In addition to other measures, the Order directs the head of each federal agency to include in every contract or grant award a term requiring the recipient to certify that it does not operate any programs promoting DEI that violate any applicable Federal anti-discrimination laws. Agencies are further directed to identify publicly traded corporations, large non-profits, foundations, or associations for potential civil compliance investigations relating to illegal DEI discrimination or preferences.</p><p>We expect federal agencies to issue additional, more detailed guidance interpreting and implementing these Executive Orders. The Orders may also face legal challenges. In the meantime, federal contractors, federal grant and/or funding recipients, and private sector organizations should consider how their current employment policies and practices, including the contents of employee handbooks and trainings, may be impacted by these Executive Orders.  Organizations are well-advised to begin reviewing their policies and practices in consultation with experienced employment law counsel and human resources advisors. Employer responses to these Orders should be tailored based on corporate and regulatory status, funding sources, and industry. Your partners at Lake Effect are here to answer your questions and discuss potential implications of these recent Orders. </p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on employment-related Executive actions, employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><strong>info@le-hrlaw.com</strong></a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/presidential-executive-orders-reject-gender-ideology-and-illegal-dei-programs/">Presidential Executive Orders Reject Gender Ideology and Illegal DEI Programs</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Final Rule Blocked: No Salary Level Increase for January 1, 2025</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/dol-final-rule-blocked-no-salary-level-increase-for-january-1-2025/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Nov 2024 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exempt employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Final Rule]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7208</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>With this decision, the federal court rendered all elements of the Final Rule null and void: the July 1, 2024 salary level increase, the January 1, 2025 salary level increase, and planned future increases for both.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/dol-final-rule-blocked-no-salary-level-increase-for-january-1-2025/">DOL Final Rule Blocked: No Salary Level Increase for January 1, 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7208" class="elementor elementor-7208" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-ea6803c e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="ea6803c" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-07b641a elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="07b641a" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>Late last week, <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/OT-SJ-Decision.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">a federal court in Texas struck down the U.S. Department of Labor’s Final Rule</a> which was set to require a second increase in the salary level on January 1, 2025. Please see Lake Effect’s <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/employers-must-implement-first-flsa-exempt-salary-increases-on-july-1-2024/">June 27, 2024,</a>  <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/be-ready-on-july-1-initial-increase-in-salary-level-for-exempt-employees-to-take-effect/">June 2, 2024</a>, and <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/us-department-of-labor-raises-salary-thresholds-for-exempt-employees/">April 24, 2024</a> blogs on the Final Rule which had already mandated an initial salary level increase effective July 1, 2024.</p><p>With this decision, the federal court rendered all elements of the Final Rule null and void: the July 1, 2024 salary level increase, the January 1, 2025 salary level increase, and planned future increases for both. In explaining the decision, the court noted that the DOL exceeded its authority by “effectively displac[ing] the FLSA’s [exemption] duties test with a predominate – if not exclusive – salary-level test.”</p><p><strong>What does this mean for employers?</strong></p><p><a><strong>Employers no longer need to increase exempt employees’ salary levels to meet the second threshold increase to $1,128 per week ($58,656 per year) effective January 1, 2025.</strong></a> This decision is well-timed, as many organizations are finalizing their 2025 budgets right now. Of note, this also means that the July 1, 2024 increases were not required.</p><p>Lake Effect is here to answer questions you may have regarding this decision and its impact on your compensation structure and budget.</p><p>The attorneys and HR professionals at Lake Effect can provide guidance on all employment laws, regulations, and agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/dol-final-rule-blocked-no-salary-level-increase-for-january-1-2025/">DOL Final Rule Blocked: No Salary Level Increase for January 1, 2025</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Court Vacates 2021 US Department of Labor Final Rule on Tipped Workers</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/federal-court-vacates-2021-us-department-of-labor-final-rule-on-tipped-workers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 22:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Labor Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7128</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On August 23, 2024, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in Texas vacated the US Department of Labor (DOL) 2021 Final Rule which had set strict guidance on the payment of tipped employees. As a reminder, the 2021 Rule had established three different categories of work that may be performed by tipped employees and specified [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/federal-court-vacates-2021-us-department-of-labor-final-rule-on-tipped-workers/">Federal Court Vacates 2021 US Department of Labor Final Rule on Tipped Workers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7128" class="elementor elementor-7128" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-c268f70 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="c268f70" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-c51989d elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="c51989d" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On August 23, 2024, the 5<sup>th</sup> Circuit Court of Appeals in Texas vacated the US Department of Labor (DOL) 2021 <a href="https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/10/29/2021-23446/tip-regulations-under-the-fair-labor-standards-act-flsa-partial-withdrawal" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Final Rule</a> which had set strict guidance on the payment of tipped employees. As a reminder, the 2021 Rule had established three different categories of work that may be performed by tipped employees and specified the FLSA pay requirements for each when employers are utilizing the tip credit method of payment. Lake Effect’s <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/us-department-of-labor-issues-final-rule-on-tipped-workers/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">prior blog</a> on this issue provides additional information and history on this topic.</p><p>The 5<sup>th</sup> Circuit Court vacated the Final Rule nationwide, holding that the DOL’s Rule was “contrary to the Fair Labor Standards Act’s clear statutory text” and “arbitrary and capricious.” The FLSA defines a “tipped employee” as “any employee engaged in an occupation in which he customarily and regularly receives more than $30 a month in tips.” Based upon this definition, the 5<sup>th</sup> Circuit found that a pay analysis should focus on the field of work and the job as a whole, rather than on attempts to apportion time to specific types of tasks. Individuals who meet the definition of a “tipped employee” based upon their overall job may be paid using the tip credit method of payment. The only exception is when a tipped employee is also truly performing another discrete job, in which case they cannot be paid by the tip credit method and instead must be paid at the relevant pay rate for the other job (i.e., working as a server and also as a maintenance person).</p><p>This simplified approach to assessing the status of tipped employees for purposes of the tip credit method of payment now stands as the law of the land. Employers utilizing this method of payment should review their current pay policies and practices in light of this development. Keep in mind that state wage and hour laws may impose different and/or more stringent requirements for the payment of tipped employees, and those laws must be taken into consideration, as well. Your partners at Lake Effect can help ensure that payment of your tipped employees complies with all applicable federal and state laws.</p><p>Lake Effect is here to answer all your questions about employment laws, regulations, and new agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253. </p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/federal-court-vacates-2021-us-department-of-labor-final-rule-on-tipped-workers/">Federal Court Vacates 2021 US Department of Labor Final Rule on Tipped Workers</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC  Ban on Noncompetition Agreements Takes Effect  </title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/ftc-ban-on-noncompetition-agreements-takes-effect/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2024 00:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-compete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noncompete]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=7108</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As we previously reported, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued its final rule on April 23, 2024, banning noncompetition agreements and related provisions.  The rule will take effect on September 4, 2024, 120 days after publication in the Federal Register.  As of September 4th, employers who have employees under existing noncompete agreements and related provisions, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/ftc-ban-on-noncompetition-agreements-takes-effect/">FTC  Ban on Noncompetition Agreements Takes Effect  </a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="7108" class="elementor elementor-7108" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-692a41f e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="692a41f" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-62d85c9 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="62d85c9" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div style="clear: both;"><p><a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/ftc-bans-noncompete-agreements/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="none"><span data-ccp-charstyle="Hyperlink">As we previously reported</span></span></a><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) issued its </span><a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/noncompete-rule.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="none"><span data-ccp-charstyle="Hyperlink">final rule</span></span></a><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"> on April 23, 2024, </span>banning noncompetition agreements and related provisions.  The rule will take effect on September 4, 2024, 120 days after publication in the Federal Register.  As of September 4<span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span data-fontsize="11">th</span></span><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">, </span>employers who have employees under existing noncompete agreements and related provisions, including nonsolicitation of employees and possibly provisions such as claw backs of training pay or a signing bonus , will be required to provide an explicit notice to  those employees that their agreements and policies are no longer enforceable (see the FTC’s model notice <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/documents/English.docx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="none"><span data-ccp-charstyle="Hyperlink">here</span></span></a><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">).</span></p><p>There is a narrow exception to the ban for senior executives who have existing agreements. Senior executives are defined as workers who earn more than $151,164 annually and who are in “policy-making positions” i.e., an organization’s president, CEO, or the equivalent, or a personal with final authority to make policy decisions controlling significant aspects of an entity. Noncompetes entered into pursuant to the bona fide sale of business entity are also excluded from the ban. There are also exemptions for certain entities, such as financial institutions and nonprofits.<br /> </p></div><div style="clear: both;"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">To prepare for September 4</span><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"><span data-fontsize="11">th</span></span><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">, Employers should review their existing agreements </span>and policies to determine who will need to receive <a href="https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/documents/English.docx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="none"><span data-ccp-charstyle="Hyperlink">the required notice</span></span></a><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">.  </span>Given pending legal challenges that could still delay or prevent enforcement of the ban, Lake Effect recommends waiting until closer to the deadline to send the notices. </div><div style="clear: both;"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">In addition,</span> employers should revise existing agreements and policies to ensure compliance going forward. <span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"> Of note,</span> employers may keep in place agreements that protect confidentiality and client relationships. However, any existing agreements that blend these permissible provisions with soon-to-be prohibited noncompetition and related provisions will have to be revised.  Employers should also be mindful of applicable state laws on the matter which may impose more stringent requirements and/or penalties relating to noncompetition provisions.<br /> </div><div style="clear: both;"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">As we quickly approach</span> September 4, 2024, Lake Effect can help assess your existing agreements, customize FTC-required notices, and recommend revisions to your agreements or handbook provisions. We will do so consistent with your mission, culture, compensation philosophy, and commitment to your employees.<br /> </div><div style="clear: both;"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto">Lake Effect is here to answer all your questions about employment laws, regulations, and new agency guidelines. We continue to </span>monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="none"><span data-ccp-charstyle="Hyperlink">info@le-hrlaw.com</span></span></a><span xml:lang="EN-US" data-contrast="auto"> or 1-844-333-5253.</span></div>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/ftc-ban-on-noncompetition-agreements-takes-effect/">FTC  Ban on Noncompetition Agreements Takes Effect  </a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Wisconsin Employment-Related Laws</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/new-wisconsin-employment-related-laws/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 17:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Workforce Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DWD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wisconsin employers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=6998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>On March 27, 2024, Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers signed two bills into law that have the potential to require actions for some employers.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/new-wisconsin-employment-related-laws/">New Wisconsin Employment-Related Laws</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="6998" class="elementor elementor-6998" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-c525cf7 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="c525cf7" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-c497ea3 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="c497ea3" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On March 27, 2024,  Governor Tony Evers signed two bills into law that will affect some Wisconsin employers.</p><p><a href="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2023/related/proposals/ab237" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2023 Wisconsin Act 237</a>:  Requires employers in industries that have frequent interactions  with vulnerable persons and the public (such as lodging, hospitality, food service, retail, residential facilities, private security, public transit managers, and others) to provide training to employees to recognize and prevent human trafficking. The details of the recommended training have not been released yet.</p><p><a href="https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2023/related/acts/228#:~:text=2023%20WISCONSIN%20ACT%20228%20An%20Act%20to%20create,in%20senate%20and%20assembly%2C%20do%20enact%20as%20follows%3A" target="_blank" rel="noopener">2023 Wisconsin Act 228:</a> Requires the Department of Workforce Development (DWD) to establish a toll-free hotline for employers to use as a resource in hiring individuals with a conviction record. This bill also requires the DWD to provide information to employers regarding incentives and programs that are available when hiring someone with a conviction record and/or  work release privileges. The hotline (and corresponding website) are not yet available.</p><p>Lake Effect is monitoring the implementation of these laws, and we will provide additional guidance as it becomes available. </p><p>Lake Effect is here to answer your questions about HR, benefits, employment laws, regulations, and new agency guidance. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/new-wisconsin-employment-related-laws/">New Wisconsin Employment-Related Laws</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review Your Handbooks Now</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/review-your-handbooks-now/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 20:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee handbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[handbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national labor relations board]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nlrb]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=6940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 2023, we encouraged organizations to review their handbooks based on recent NLRB decisions focused on employees’ rights to engage in protected activity even in non-union settings. We are renewing that call &#8211; as several states have implemented new laws that could have a significant impact on handbooks and employment policies. For [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/review-your-handbooks-now/">Review Your Handbooks Now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="6940" class="elementor elementor-6940" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5512289 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="5512289" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-8dfbb2b elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="8dfbb2b" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>In the fall of 2023, we encouraged organizations to <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/6795-2/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">review their handbooks based on recent NLRB decisions</a> focused on employees’ rights to engage in protected activity even in non-union settings. We are renewing that call &#8211; as several states have implemented new laws that could have a significant impact on handbooks and employment policies. For example, Minnesota and Illinois have both enacted paid time off laws which take effect January of 2024.</p><p>Under Minnesota’s <a href="https://www.dli.mn.gov/sick-leave" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Earned Sick and Safe Time</a>, which applies to all employees who work 80 or more hours in a year, employees earn one hour of paid leave for every 30 hours worked. Similarly, Illinois’ <a href="https://labor.illinois.gov/laws-rules/paidleave.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Paid Leave for All Workers Act</a> grants all employees one hour of paid leave for every 40 hours worked. These and other state leave laws are detailed and require integration with existing leave policies. It may be necessary to track leave, display accrued time on paystubs, display postings, or notify employees of the applicable law. Lake Effect can help organizations that have workers in multiple states and need assistance navigating these or other state employment laws.</p><p>Lake Effect is here to answer all of your questions about HR, benefits, employment laws, regulations, and new agency guidance. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/review-your-handbooks-now/">Review Your Handbooks Now</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Test for Employee vs. Independent Contractor</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/employee-vs-independent-contractor/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2024 16:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Labor Standards Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[independent contractors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=6867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As of March 11, 2024, the US Department of Labor (DOL) will return to the analysis it has historically used to classify workers, employing a six-factor balancing test.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/employee-vs-independent-contractor/">New Test for Employee vs. Independent Contractor</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="6867" class="elementor elementor-6867" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-2fd766f e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="2fd766f" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-328acfe elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="328acfe" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>On January 9, 2024, the US Department of Labor (DOL) released a rule setting forth the new standard for properly classifying workers as independent contractors. As a reminder, the classification of a worker as a W-2 employee or an independent contractor governs their eligibility for minimum wages, overtime pay, and other rights protected under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). There are also IRS tax implications and other consequences under federal and state laws. Employers who misclassify workers can face substantial liability for back pay, taxes, and other penalties.</p><p>As of March 11, 2024, the US Department of Labor (DOL) will return to the analysis it has historically used to classify workers, employing a six-factor balancing test to assess the relationship between employer and worker. The DOL’s <strong><a href="https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/flsa/misclassification/rulemaking" target="_blank" rel="noopener">new rule</a></strong> specifically rescinds a modified independent contractor test issued under the Trump Administration in 2021.</p><p>Under the DOL rule, the classification of a worker will be determined by evaluating the following <strong>six-factors</strong>:</p><ul><li>opportunity for profit or loss depending on managerial skill;</li><li>investments by the worker and the potential employer;</li><li>degree of permanence of the work relationship;</li><li>nature and degree of potential employer’s control over the work being performed (considering issues such as scheduling, supervision, setting prices or rates, worker’s ability to work for others, etc.);</li><li>extent to which the work performed is an integral part of potential employer’s business; and</li><li>whether the worker uses specialized skills to perform the work and whether those skills contribute to business-like initiative.</li></ul><p>These factors will be assessed under a “totality of the circumstances” approach, each one viewed equally, with no factor(s) afforded more weight than others. Furthermore, the DOL will consider additional, unspecified factors if they indicate in some way whether the worker is in business for themself, as opposed to being economically dependent on the employer for work.</p><p>With the effective date of the DOL’s new test on the horizon, now is a good time to review your workforce and the status of any independent contractors. Your partners at Lake Effect can help evaluate whether your workers are classified properly, minimizing your future exposure to hefty back pay awards and other penalties.</p><p>Lake Effect is here to answer all your questions about employment laws, regulations, and new agency guidelines. We continue to monitor important legal and HR developments, as well as other information that could impact the workplace. Please watch our blogs and emails for these important updates, as well as discussions of how compliance meets culture. To dive into these issues, contact us at <a href="mailto:info@le-hrlaw.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener">info@le-hrlaw.com</a> or 1-844-333-5253.</p>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/employee-vs-independent-contractor/">New Test for Employee vs. Independent Contractor</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benefits Limits for 2024</title>
		<link>https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2024/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[admin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 16:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Human Resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benefits limits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee benefit plans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retirement plans]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.le-hrlaw.com/?p=6811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>2024 IRS limits for employee benefit plans, flex plans, and retirement plans.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2024/">Benefits Limits for 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[		<div data-elementor-type="wp-post" data-elementor-id="6811" class="elementor elementor-6811" data-elementor-post-type="post">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-5d06354c e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="5d06354c" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-584e931d elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="584e931d" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p>Each year, the IRS sets new limits for <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-23-23.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">employee benefits plans</a>, <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-23-34.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">flex plans</a>, and <a href="https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-23-75.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">retirement plans</a>. Please see below for Lake Effect’s ready reference chart setting forth the Benefits Limits for the 2024 tax year.</p>								</div>
				</div>
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-4923aab elementor-align-right elementor-widget elementor-widget-button" data-id="4923aab" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="button.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<div class="elementor-button-wrapper">
					<a class="elementor-button elementor-button-link elementor-size-xs" href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2024-Benefit-Limits-Lake-Effect-HR-and-Law-Resource.pdf" target="_blank">
						<span class="elementor-button-content-wrapper">
									<span class="elementor-button-text">Download Benefits Table</span>
					</span>
					</a>
				</div>
								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
		<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-a152523 e-flex e-con-boxed e-con e-parent" data-id="a152523" data-element_type="container" data-e-type="container">
					<div class="e-con-inner">
				<div class="elementor-element elementor-element-a873d51 elementor-widget elementor-widget-text-editor" data-id="a873d51" data-element_type="widget" data-e-type="widget" data-widget_type="text-editor.default">
				<div class="elementor-widget-container">
									<p> </p><table width="654"><tbody><tr><td width="458"> </td><td width="100"><p><strong>2023</strong></p></td><td width="96"><p><strong>2024</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs)</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Healthcare FSA max election (per year) (incl. LTD FSA)</p></td><td width="100"><p>$3,050</p></td><td width="96"><p>$3,200</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Healthcare FSA max rollover</p></td><td width="100"><p>$610</p></td><td width="96"><p>$640</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Dependent Care FSA max election (per year) (Single or Married Filing Jointly)</p></td><td width="100"><p>$5,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$5,000</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Dependent Care FSA max election (per year) (Married Filing Separately)</p></td><td width="100"><p>$2,500</p></td><td width="96"><p>$2,500</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"> </td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Transportation Benefits</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Parking Account</p></td><td width="100"><p>$300/mo</p></td><td width="96"><p>$315/mo</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Transit Account</p></td><td width="100"><p>$300/mo</p></td><td width="96"><p>$315/mo</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"> </td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>High Deductible Health Plan Requirements to Contribute to an HSA</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HDHP min annual deductible &#8211; Self-only</p></td><td width="100"><p>$1,500</p></td><td width="96"><p>$1,600</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HDHP min annual deductible &#8211; Family</p></td><td width="100"><p>$3,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$3,200</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HDHP out-of-pocket max &#8211; Self-only</p></td><td width="100"><p>$7,500</p></td><td width="96"><p>$8,050</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HDHP out-of-pocket max &#8211; Family</p></td><td width="100"><p>$15,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$16,100</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HSA max contribution limit &#8211; Self-only</p></td><td width="100"><p>$3,850</p></td><td width="96"><p>$4,150</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HSA max contribution limit &#8211; Family</p></td><td width="100"><p>$7,750</p></td><td width="96"><p>$8,300</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HSA catch up contribution limit (age 55+)</p></td><td width="100"><p>$1,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$1,000</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>HRA max employer contribution limit</p></td><td width="100"><p>$1,950</p></td><td width="96"><p>$2,100</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"> </td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>ACA Plan Limits</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Maximum Out-of-Pocket (Self-only or Individual in a Family)</p></td><td width="100"><p>$9,100</p></td><td width="96"><p>$9,450</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Maximum Out-of-Pocket (Family)</p></td><td width="100"><p>$18,200</p></td><td width="96"><p>$18,900</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"> </td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>QSEHRA (Qualified Small Employer Health Reimbursement Arrangement) – Max Employer contribution</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>To Individual</p></td><td width="100"><p>$5,850</p></td><td width="96"><p>$6,150</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>To Family</p></td><td width="100"><p>$11,800</p></td><td width="96"><p>$12,450</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Salary Thresholds for Non-discrimination Testing</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Highly compensated employees</p></td><td width="100"><p>$150,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$155,000</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Key employees</p></td><td width="100"><p>$215,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$220,000</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"> </td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p><span style="color: #00a5b6;"><strong>Retirement Plans (401(k), 403(b))</strong></span></p></td><td width="100"> </td><td width="96"> </td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Max employee elective contributions for those 49 and younger</p></td><td width="100"><p>$22,500</p></td><td width="96"><p>$23,000</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Max employer + employee contributions for those 49 and younger</p></td><td width="100"><p>$66,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$69,000</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Max employee catch-up contributions for those 50+</p></td><td width="100"><p>$7,500</p></td><td width="96"><p>$7,500</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Max employee elective contribution plus catch-up for those 50+</p></td><td width="100"><p>$30,000</p></td><td width="96"><p>$30,500</p></td></tr><tr><td width="458"><p>Max employer + employee contributions for those 50+</p></td><td width="100"><p>$73,500</p></td><td width="96"><p>$76,500</p></td></tr></tbody></table>								</div>
				</div>
					</div>
				</div>
				</div>
		<p>The post <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com/benefits-limits-for-2024/">Benefits Limits for 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.le-hrlaw.com">Lake Effect HR &amp; Law</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
